Fred’s Response
Monday, February 19th, 2007Just in case you missed my response to Charlie Kraebal - here it is:
Charlie,
If it “ain’t about me,” why does my name have to be included in every story about the site?
I’m not sure how long you have been working at the Free Press but the story appeared on the front page of your newspaper on August 18, 2006; it is now February 17, 2007. During this time period it has been the lead story on the Local & State section 2 times. Saturday, September 23rd edition used the Local & State for a lead Story and also was the total editorial content for that day. It was also a story below the fold on the Local & State page on August 29, 2006 - that seems to be a lot of ink about a slimy politician looking for free publicity. Each story stated the SBOE received a complaint about the site from a “very concerned citizen.”
I don’t care how many times you run the story, all I ask is it be updated with the facts.
Since I was the one under investigation I had to be told who the “concerned citizen” was. Your reporters have been told a number of times the name of said “concerned citizen” (Van Braxton) yet you refuse to disclose it.
Braxton cries, “I just want to see if there is some way to have that site removed”. He knows where I live and he obviously knows how to talk on the telephone because on Sept. 1, 2006 Don Wright, the general counsel to the State Board of Elections, told me in person “Braxton called in the complaint”. Instead of acting like a real man, he chose to waste thousands of tax payer dollars on a complaint that he knew would not be resolved. I even sent him a certified letter and he refused to accept it, now that’s a legislator to be proud of.
It’s easy for you to say chill out because you have not endured the pure hell that I have.
Because of this I was subpoenaed and had to appear in person at the SBOE office in Raleigh - this resulted in digging into records that had nothing to do with the complaint. The client provided a letter stating why the site was created and gave an explanation as to why they wanted to remain anonymous. The SBOE could have, and still could rule without knowing the name of the site owner or designer, but they did not, even after I turned over the name.
That subpoena also cost me a political job that I held for more than 12 years.
I could go on for hours but I have other things to do, run the story every day but bring your readers up to date and don’t forget to spell my name right.
